Catalogue with hydraulic data from the article of Drif et al.(2024) at Soultz-sous-Forets 2010. For more detailed calculations, see the article Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: the Case Study of the EGS Soultz-sous-Forets Site by Drif,K., Lengline, O., Kinscher, J., Schmitbuhl, J. (2024) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JB028190) The data parameters are the following: Column 1:Time from start: 30/11/2009 23:00:00 Column 2: Time_from_start_injection: time elapsed since start of fluid injection [hours] Column 3: Mean of the depth events (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred during each hour [m] Column 4: Cumulative injected volume in [m3] Column 5: Cumulative hydraulic energy in [J] Column 6: Cumulative seismic moment (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [N.m] Column 7: The seismic moment associated to the largest event (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred to date in [N.m] Column 8: Cumulative radiated seismic energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 9: Seismic Injection Efficiency defined as the ratio between Er_cum and W_hyd_cum Column 10: Cumulative seismic faulting energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 11: Seismic faulting efficiency definied as the ratio between W_fault_cum and W_hyd_cum Last update of data: 07/05/2024

Catalogue with hydraulic data from the article of Drif et al.(2024) at Soultz-sous-Forets 2005. For more detailed calculations, see the article Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: the Case Study of the EGS Soultz-sous-Forets Site by Drif,K., Lengline, O., Kinscher, J., Schmitbuhl, J. (2024) ( http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JB028190) The data parameters are the following: Column 1: Time from start: 07/02/2005 18:00:00 Column 2: Time_from_start_injection: time elapsed since start of fluid injection [hours] Column 3: Mean of the depth events (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred during each hour [m] Column 4: Mean of flowrate during each hour [l/s] Column 5: Cumulative injected volume in [m3] Column 6: Cumulative hydraulic energy in [J] Column 7: Cumulative seismic moment (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [N.m] Column 8: The seismic moment associated to the largest event (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred to date in [N.m] Column 9: Cumulative radiated seismic energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 10: Seismic Injection Efficiency defined as the ratio between Er_cum and W_hyd_cum Column 11: Cumulative seismic faulting energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 12: Seismic faulting efficiency definied as the ratio between W_fault_cum and W_hyd_cum Last update of data: 07/05/2024

Data used to generate the figures of the paper: J. Azzola, J. Schmittbuhl, D.Zigone, V. Magnenet, and F. Masson (2017). Direct modeling of the mechanical strain influence on coda wave interferometry. Journal of Geophysical Research. Accepted article. (https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015162) This work has been published under the framework of the LABEX ANR-11-LABX-0050-G-EAU-THERMIE-PROFONDE and benefits from a funding from the state managed by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the ‘Investments for the Future’ program. It has also been funded by the EU project DESTRESS (EU H2020 research and innovation program, grant agreement No 691728). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Velocity model and station corrections described in the PhD thesis of <b>N. Cuenot</b>, used to calculate location of microseismic events of his first catalogue of the 2000 stimulation episode at Soultz-sous-Forêts. N. Cuenot performed preliminary locations during his PhD using a modified version of the HYPOINVERSE program (Klein, 1978). An initial velocity model established by Darnet (2000) was first used but did not give satisfactory results. The velocity model was thus refined. P waves velocities were iteratively calculated by minimizing residual errors at the stations. The ratio Vp/Vs was similarly adjusted in the sedimentary layers. At least, station corrections were used to get hypocenters as precise as possible. The first catalogue of events of the 2000 episode calculated by N. Cuenot using the HYPOINVERSE program is available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS2000-catalogue). Last update of data: 26/11/2018

Catalogue with hydraulic data from the article of Drif et al.(2024) at Soultz-sous-Forets 1995. For more detailed calculations, see the article Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: the Case Study of the EGS Soultz-sous-Forets Site by Drif,K., Lengline, O., Kinscher, J., Schmitbuhl, J. (2024) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JB028190) The data parameters are the following: Column 1: Time from start: 17/06/1995 10:00:00 Column 2: Time_from_start_injection: time elapsed since start of fluid injection [hours] Column 3: Mean of the depth events (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred during each hour [m] Column 4: Mean of flowrate during each hour [l/s] Column 5: Cumulative injected volume in [m3] Column 6: Cumulative hydraulic energy in [J] Column 7: Cumulative seismic moment (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [N.m] Column 8: The seismic moment associated to the largest event (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred to date in [N.m] Column 9: Cumulative radiated seismic energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 10: Seismic Injection Efficiency defined as the ratio between Er_cum and W_hyd_cum Column 11: Cumulative seismic faulting energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 12: Seismic faulting efficiency definied as the ratio between W_fault_cum and W_hyd_cum Last update of data: 07/05/2024

Catalogue with hydraulic data from the article of Drif et al.(2024) at Soultz-sous-Forets 1996. For more detailed calculations, see the article Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: the Case Study of the EGS Soultz-sous-Forets Site by Drif,K., Lengline, O., Kinscher, J., Schmitbuhl, J. (2024) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JB028190) The data parameters are the following: Column 1: Column 1: Time from start: 18/09/1996 12:00:00 Column 2: Time_from_start_injection: time elapsed since start of fluid injection [hours] Column 3: Mean of the depth events (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred during each hour [m] Column 4: Mean of flowrate during each hour [l/s] Column 5: Cumulative injected volume in [m3] Column 6: Cumulative hydraulic energy in [J] Column 7: Cumulative seismic moment (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [N.m] Column 8: The seismic moment associated to the largest event (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred to date in [N.m] Column 9: Cumulative radiated seismic energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 10: Seismic Injection Efficiency defined as the ratio between Er_cum and W_hyd_cum Column 11: Cumulative seismic faulting energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 12: Seismic faulting efficiency definied as the ratio between W_fault_cum and W_hyd_cum Last update of data: 07/05/2024

Catalogue of microseismicity recorded at Soultz-sous-Forêts during 1993 stimulation by the downhole network. This catalogue is part of Seid Bourouis Thesis: Sismicité induite et comportement mécanique d'un massif granitique fracturé par injection d'eau - Application au site géothermique de Soultz-sous-Forêts. Number of events: 15534. The data parameters used are the following: Column 1: Seismic ID Column 2: Event number Column 3: Record name Column 4: Date Column 5: Time (local) Column 6: Time (UTC) * Column 7: Easting from GPK1 wellhead Column 8: Northing from GPK1 wellhead Column 9: Depth from GPK1 wellhead Column 10: Latitude WGS84 ** Column 11: Longitude WGS84 ** Column 12: Elevation WGS84 ** * The UTC time has been calculated from the local time. ** Latitude, longitude and elevation have been derived from easting, northing and depth from GPK1 wellhead. The microseismic downhole network is available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS1993-network). The associated waveforms are available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS1993-seed). Last update of data: 23/07/2019

Velocity model described in J. Helm thesis (p.127) according to Beauce et al. (1991). The velocity model was used to calculate location of microseismic events from the surface network during 1993 stimulation. The catalogue of events located during 1993 stimulation using the surface network is available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS1993-catalogue_Helm). Last update of data: 26/07/2019

Microseismic catalogue with local magnitude of the 2000 episode at Soultz-sous-Forêts calculated by B. Dyer (Semore Seismic) using the surface network. Number of events: 51. Microseismic monitoring of the hydraulic programme at Soultz took place between June 30th and July 18th. The catalogue contains the 51 largest events detected on the surface network during the 2000 episode. Each event identity and location in the catalogue was assigned by correlating the times of the events on the surface network with the times of the microseismic events from the catalogue of the downhole network of B. Dyer (available https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS2000-catalogue_downhole). Some discrepancies of few minutes for a same event between the two catalogues are possible because of the gap in time between the twok clocks on the two data acquisition systems. Some locations are missing because of insufficient picks, due to noise, or insufficient data, due to one or more sensors being inoperative. Time period: 30/06/2000 23:09 - 25/07/2000 09:06 (UTC time). The data parameters are the following: Column 1: Event number Column 2: Date (UTC) Column 3: Time (UTC) Column 4: Easting from GPK1 wellhead * Column 5: Northing from GPK1 wellhead * Column 6: Depth from GPK1 wellhead * Column 7: Latitude WGS84 ** Column 8: Longitude WGS84 ** Column 9: Elevation WGS84 ** Column 10: Local magnitude * The local coordinate system is based on the UTM32 system. ** Latitude, longitude and elevation have been derived from the local coordinate system. The description of the surface network is available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS2000-surface_network). The velocity model used is available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS2000-velocity_model_downhole). Last update of data: 20/01/2022

The microseismic network in operation during the 1995 stimulation, injection and circulation experiments represents a slightly modified version of the 1993 system. It consisted of accelerometers (4-component sensors) built by the CSMA in boreholes 4550, 4601, 4616 and of a single hydrophone in EPS1. These sensors were used throughout the 1995 experimental programme. A further hydrophone was deployed in GPK1 at a depth of 3480m to monitor the brine injection (Wilson, S.A., Jupe, A.J., Jones R.H. and Dyer, B., 1996.Microseismic results from the 1995 Soultz experimental programme, CSMA Report for Socomine, January 1996.). The X,Y,Z coordinates in the file refer to the local coordinate system with the GPK1 wellhead as origin: X: Easting in meters from GPK1 wellhead (toward magnetic East) Y: Northing in meters from GPK1 wellhead (toward magnetic North) Z: Depth in meters from GPK1 wellhead The local coordinate system is based on the UTM32 system. The coordinates of the stations in the local coordinate system have been obtained from the thesis of S. Bourouis (Sismicité induite et comportement mécanique d'un massif granitique fracturé par injection d'eau). The exact coordinates of the GPK1 hydrophone have not been retrieved and so are not in the file. The latitude, longitude and elevation in the WGS84 coordinate system have been derived from the local coordinate system. Last update of data: 24/07/2019