Data used to generate the figures of the paper: Jestin, C., Lengliné, O., Schmittbuhl, J. (2019). Energy partitioning during sub-critical mode I crack propagation through a heterogeneous interface. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124 (https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016831); This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

3D velocity model of the Upper Rhine Graben, from Lengliné et al. (2023). Grids are +/-100km in X and Y directions around LatOrig=48.661660 and LongOrig=7.773860, (401 points @ 500m between points), and 0-50km in depth (101 points @ 500m). Data are in NonLinLoc (https://github.com/alomax/NonLinLoc) format.

Catalogue with hydraulic data from the article of Drif et al.(2024) at Soultz-sous-Forets 2010. For more detailed calculations, see the article Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: the Case Study of the EGS Soultz-sous-Forets Site by Drif,K., Lengline, O., Kinscher, J., Schmitbuhl, J. (2024) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JB028190) The data parameters are the following: Column 1:Time from start: 30/11/2009 23:00:00 Column 2: Time_from_start_injection: time elapsed since start of fluid injection [hours] Column 3: Mean of the depth events (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred during each hour [m] Column 4: Cumulative injected volume in [m3] Column 5: Cumulative hydraulic energy in [J] Column 6: Cumulative seismic moment (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [N.m] Column 7: The seismic moment associated to the largest event (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred to date in [N.m] Column 8: Cumulative radiated seismic energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 9: Seismic Injection Efficiency defined as the ratio between Er_cum and W_hyd_cum Column 10: Cumulative seismic faulting energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 11: Seismic faulting efficiency definied as the ratio between W_fault_cum and W_hyd_cum Last update of data: 07/05/2024

Catalogue with hydraulic data from the article of Drif et al.(2024) at Soultz-sous-Forets 2005. For more detailed calculations, see the article Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: the Case Study of the EGS Soultz-sous-Forets Site by Drif,K., Lengline, O., Kinscher, J., Schmitbuhl, J. (2024) ( http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JB028190) The data parameters are the following: Column 1: Time from start: 07/02/2005 18:00:00 Column 2: Time_from_start_injection: time elapsed since start of fluid injection [hours] Column 3: Mean of the depth events (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred during each hour [m] Column 4: Mean of flowrate during each hour [l/s] Column 5: Cumulative injected volume in [m3] Column 6: Cumulative hydraulic energy in [J] Column 7: Cumulative seismic moment (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [N.m] Column 8: The seismic moment associated to the largest event (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred to date in [N.m] Column 9: Cumulative radiated seismic energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 10: Seismic Injection Efficiency defined as the ratio between Er_cum and W_hyd_cum Column 11: Cumulative seismic faulting energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 12: Seismic faulting efficiency definied as the ratio between W_fault_cum and W_hyd_cum Last update of data: 07/05/2024

Data used to generate the figures of the paper: J. Azzola, J. Schmittbuhl, D.Zigone, V. Magnenet, and F. Masson (2017). Direct modeling of the mechanical strain influence on coda wave interferometry. Journal of Geophysical Research. Accepted article. (https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015162) This work has been published under the framework of the LABEX ANR-11-LABX-0050-G-EAU-THERMIE-PROFONDE and benefits from a funding from the state managed by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the ‘Investments for the Future’ program. It has also been funded by the EU project DESTRESS (EU H2020 research and innovation program, grant agreement No 691728). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Velocity model and station corrections described in the PhD thesis of <b>N. Cuenot</b>, used to calculate location of microseismic events of his first catalogue of the 2000 stimulation episode at Soultz-sous-Forêts. N. Cuenot performed preliminary locations during his PhD using a modified version of the HYPOINVERSE program (Klein, 1978). An initial velocity model established by Darnet (2000) was first used but did not give satisfactory results. The velocity model was thus refined. P waves velocities were iteratively calculated by minimizing residual errors at the stations. The ratio Vp/Vs was similarly adjusted in the sedimentary layers. At least, station corrections were used to get hypocenters as precise as possible. The first catalogue of events of the 2000 episode calculated by N. Cuenot using the HYPOINVERSE program is available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS2000-catalogue). Last update of data: 26/11/2018

The 4601 well was an old oil well drilled in 1951. It has been deepened in the framework of the Soultz-sous-Forêts project from 1010m to 1604m. A seismic probe was deployed at the bottom of the well to monitor the microseismic activity induced by the several experiments conducted on the geothermal site of Soultz-sous-Forêts. Location of the 4601 wellhead (in WGS84): - Latitude: 48.92805654 | 48° 55' 41" N - Longitude: 7.84882476 | 7° 50' 55" E - Altitude: 169m

Catalogue with hydraulic data from the article of Drif et al.(2024) at Soultz-sous-Forets 1995. For more detailed calculations, see the article Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: the Case Study of the EGS Soultz-sous-Forets Site by Drif,K., Lengline, O., Kinscher, J., Schmitbuhl, J. (2024) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JB028190) The data parameters are the following: Column 1: Time from start: 17/06/1995 10:00:00 Column 2: Time_from_start_injection: time elapsed since start of fluid injection [hours] Column 3: Mean of the depth events (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred during each hour [m] Column 4: Mean of flowrate during each hour [l/s] Column 5: Cumulative injected volume in [m3] Column 6: Cumulative hydraulic energy in [J] Column 7: Cumulative seismic moment (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [N.m] Column 8: The seismic moment associated to the largest event (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred to date in [N.m] Column 9: Cumulative radiated seismic energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 10: Seismic Injection Efficiency defined as the ratio between Er_cum and W_hyd_cum Column 11: Cumulative seismic faulting energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 12: Seismic faulting efficiency definied as the ratio between W_fault_cum and W_hyd_cum Last update of data: 07/05/2024

Catalogue with hydraulic data from the article of Drif et al.(2024) at Soultz-sous-Forets 1996. For more detailed calculations, see the article Induced Seismicity Controlled by Injected Hydraulic Energy: the Case Study of the EGS Soultz-sous-Forets Site by Drif,K., Lengline, O., Kinscher, J., Schmitbuhl, J. (2024) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023JB028190) The data parameters are the following: Column 1: Column 1: Time from start: 18/09/1996 12:00:00 Column 2: Time_from_start_injection: time elapsed since start of fluid injection [hours] Column 3: Mean of the depth events (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred during each hour [m] Column 4: Mean of flowrate during each hour [l/s] Column 5: Cumulative injected volume in [m3] Column 6: Cumulative hydraulic energy in [J] Column 7: Cumulative seismic moment (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [N.m] Column 8: The seismic moment associated to the largest event (whose magnitude > Mc) occurred to date in [N.m] Column 9: Cumulative radiated seismic energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 10: Seismic Injection Efficiency defined as the ratio between Er_cum and W_hyd_cum Column 11: Cumulative seismic faulting energy (events whose magnitude > Mc) in [J] Column 12: Seismic faulting efficiency definied as the ratio between W_fault_cum and W_hyd_cum Last update of data: 07/05/2024

Catalogue of microseismicity recorded at Soultz-sous-Forêts during 1993 stimulation by the downhole network. This catalogue is part of Seid Bourouis Thesis: Sismicité induite et comportement mécanique d'un massif granitique fracturé par injection d'eau - Application au site géothermique de Soultz-sous-Forêts. Number of events: 15534. The data parameters used are the following: Column 1: Seismic ID Column 2: Event number Column 3: Record name Column 4: Date Column 5: Time (local) Column 6: Time (UTC) * Column 7: Easting from GPK1 wellhead Column 8: Northing from GPK1 wellhead Column 9: Depth from GPK1 wellhead Column 10: Latitude WGS84 ** Column 11: Longitude WGS84 ** Column 12: Elevation WGS84 ** * The UTC time has been calculated from the local time. ** Latitude, longitude and elevation have been derived from easting, northing and depth from GPK1 wellhead. The microseismic downhole network is available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS1993-network). The associated waveforms are available (https://cdgp.u-strasbg.fr/geonetwork/srv/fre/catalog.search#/metadata/SSFS1993-seed). Last update of data: 23/07/2019